'Justify a war Essay\r'

'If the character, Agamemnon, was seeking advice, which philosopher would he select as scoop advisor and which of these; Socrates, Homer, Aristophanes, would he engage as least advisor? Why? First, it is requisite to re extremity that Agamemnon was a king. According the Homer, this man had tre mendous condition and the highest social position. He had a corking authority among his neighbors, which helped him to organize the army. However, Homer described him as a man who always needed the advice.\r\nsometimes Agamemnon allowed his emotions to dominate over his wisdom and experience. He is properly warrior and undecomposed command, scarcely he is imperfect regulator for peaceful action. If this character was seeking advice, he’d probably gathered all the wise men in his kingdom. Homer would likely tell him some the god’s will, which determined the actions of rulers. Socrates would call him to be the philosopher king †the wise ruler who thinks about the in terests of the put up in general and the customary slew on particular.\r\nAnd Aristophanes would probably be skeptical about the ideas of devil previous speakers; he was kn consume as the sustain of satire and his skepticism as for the issues of the wars, tell organisation and rulers was well-known all over ancient Greece. However, choosing the best advisor Agamemnon would probably choose Homer. Both Socrates and Aristophanes didn’t approve the idea of the war. Perhaps, their advices as for peaceful life and wise ruling could be useful true fir Agamemnon, but he didn’t need such advices. It is known that every person hears what he or she wants to hear.\r\nAgamemnon the king seek the â€Å"casus belli”, the event to justify a war. The will of gods was the most appropriate philosophy for him, and the twat of Helen was just the secondary reason. Homer. The Iliad. Richmond Lattimore, translator. lolly: University of Chicago Press (1951) 2 Compare and cont rast classic comedies and tragedies. Include choice of plays, production, plot subject bodily, sense of hearing participation, and costumes Aristotle was the freshman who compared Greek comedies and tragedies in his â€Å"Poetics”. â€Å"A tragedy, then, is the fake of an action that is serious…\r\nin a dramatic, non in a narrative form; with incidents arousing shame and fear, with which to accomplish its catharsis of such emotions” (Poetics, VI. 2) Both these genres had their beginnings in the Greek theater. The tragedy appeared in the middle of sixth century BC, the frivolity followed the tragedy fifty age later (though these dates are very rough, we don’t really know much about these times). As for the choice of plays the tragedy is the serious play, which is based on the solemn issue of social, religious or personalised nature.\r\nThe comedy is the play humorous actions of characters solving the same(p) personal, social and religious issues. The plot subject material was also different. â€Å"Tragedies were based largely on the myths or stories of the old narrative epic poems, of which only cardinal main ones, the Iliad and the Odyssey, both written by Homer, survive. (Fornesca, 2010) â€Å" The first comedies were devoted to the god Dionysus, thus the plot of comedy was based on the festivals, the holidays in the wake of Dionysus In the center of tragedy usually was protagonist, the idealized finger who became the victim of fate.\r\nThe center of the comedy usually is the condition who goes through all the troubles. The tragedies are focused on the feelings of pity and fear in audience; the order of the comedy is the amusement and laugh. The characters of comedies and tragedies used different masks to plant emotions. The clothes of tragic characters showed their social statuc and gender (women weren’t allowed to the stage). The clothes of comic heroes were different, initially they looked like satires, t he disciples of Dyonisius. Rehm, R. Greek Tragic Theatre (1992) 3. How did Aristotle’s ideas about organisation and society differ from those of Plato?\r\nWhich one fits the United States clay of government best and why? Though Aristotle and Plato were intimately linked, Aristotle was a pupil of Plato, they had different view, Aristotle criticized the ideas of his teacher. Political theory of Plato includes the description of ideal government for the utopian society. base on the traditional for ancient Greece ethics of virtue, Plato created the exemplar of communist or totalitarian state government. In the Dialogue â€Å"The Republic” he divided the ideal society on three collections: â€Å"rulers, auxiliaries and labourers.\r\n” (Gaarder 91) Rulers, according to Plato, should be the shielder class, they had to be educated and intelligent. The children in the guardian class should be learned how to rule from the former(a) childhood. The consequence of th is frame is the absence of social mobility. This scheme is totally antidemocratic. However Plato was sure that every member of this utopian society can be happy knowing his in her position in society, as well as social function and the designated role. Aristotle disagreed with his teacher. He believed there is no single agreement of state government, which could be suitable for every society.\r\nThe appropriate scheme of disposal depends on the aims of the state. Aristotle described three good system of governing: monarchy, the power of aristocracy and the system he called polity, which corresponds to modern democracy. For every system Aristotle highlighted the faltering sides. Thus, the monarch can become the tyrant who oppresses race, and the power of aristocracy can enslave the people they rule. As for polity both Plato and Aristotle both feared that this system of governing might lead to the rule of the ignorant many an(prenominal) over the educated few.\r\n” It i s clear that the modern system if governing in the USA corresponds to the views of Aristotle, and possible the fear of ancient philosopher wasn’t ungrounded. Gaarder, J. Sophie’s World ( Sofies verden Norw). hardbacked & Paperback, 1991. 4 Using the play, â€Å"The Apology” fructify Sophist. According to that definition, was Socrates a Sophist? Give the reasons for your answer. The sophists were the group of philosopher contemporary to Socrates. Their task main was teaching the Athenian youth to create the convincing arguments and to convince the people.\r\nThey taught their students to surround both sides on the issue. Their philosophy was the kind of relativism; they mentation there is no truth, just the different and irrelevant opinions. It the negative meaning sophist is the person who plays both sides. Plato in his â€Å"Apology” describes Socrates trying to convince the board he was not the sophist. Perhaps the rhetoric of Socrates and the sophists had the common features; however sophists charged fees for their teaching, and Socrates stayed poor. The sophists used their companionship for their own gain.\r\nThey really taught their students to be prominent and to manipulate the people’s mind, the skills that could be used for political end, but enrichment was their primary aim, according to Plato. Plato thought that trading with the knowledge could be the field of bias and manipulation. He supposititious sophists in telling their students the things that weren’t good for them. impertinent them, Socrates didn’t profit from his reaching. That is why Plato set Socrates by from sophists. In many of Plato’s dialogues Socrates reveals the emptiness of their teachings.\r\nAt least, the principal difference between Socrates and sophists was in locating to knowledge. The sophists claimed that they gained access to special knowledge through the probe and experience, and this knowledge could be taught. Socrates was confessed he knew nothing †he meant the more he learned the more he understood the infinitude of the knowledge. It is no wonder that sophists was among the people who accused Socrates and became the reason of his death. Rowe, C. J. â€Å"Plato on the Sophists as Teachers of Virtue. ” news report of Political Thought 4 (1983), 409-27.\r\n'