Compare The Strengths And Limitations Of A Range Of Assessment Methods

liken the strengths and limitations of a range of assessment manners with reference to the invites of individual learnersDirect watching in the primary source of gathering read within NVQs as it is the most appropriate way of presenting naturally occurring exhibit. Youre watching the nominee carry out his routine work but on the a nonher(prenominal) hand the standdidate may per found for you or become rattling nervous with you watching. Per descriptorance evidence demands consistent and repeated performance to the require standard.Work products might be pre op checks, job descriptions, duty rosters, check lists, accident forms, policies and procedures, place downs of bring forward calls, records of correspondence communication book records.Work products about clients or stave should non be photocopied and put in the portfolio. Assessors should view them and fill in the applicable sheet fileing what was read, where its unplowed and for which PCs, it is relevant and atta ch it to an Evidence render sheet.The candidates contribution to the Work Product needs to be made clear. pose in an organisational policy or procedure does not show evidence of the candidates skill or knowledge unless there is evidence to show. They understand the policy or procedure or they have utilise it to their own bea of work or they have trained their staff in it or they have functiond the policy or procedure.Generally certificates come throughd provide proof of attendance at a course and are not a test of knowledge or competence. Assessors may need to ask questions to test competence or knowledge. Some tax assessors now show proof of competence across defined situations and this provides good evidence. If candidates are perspicacious to keep certificates in their portfolio dont discourage them, these could be kept in the Supporting Evidence section at the back.Check and fill in the Witness Status List at the front of the candidates portfolio with regards to who can be used as a professA witness should ideally hold the NVQ assessor award and be in a supervisory capacity to the candidate. Colleagues can give Witness statements but in a small environment issues of pressure and collusion can arise.Assessors can use witnesses to confirm the content of a Candidate Report by pen a supporting statement at the end of the evidence record sheet. There are two types of witness the honest witness and the non-expert witness.An expert witness is soul given the role of regularly and systematically observe and reporting on candidates when they are performing tasks which produce evidence towards an NVQ and who is occupationally competent, with the prerequisite expertise in the area for which they are providing testimony. This info should be famed by the assessor.Briefed by the QA to ensure that they understand the standards to which the evidence relates because the expert witness testimony is more rigorous and covers a wider range of the candidates pe rformance, it usually has greater weight than the testimony of other witnesses. Non experts my also be used as witnesses, however, their evidence may be less tried than that of the expert witness as they are unlikely to be old(prenominal) with the standards being assessed.Assessors must judge the validity of all witness testimonies. NVQ units cannot be achieved by relying on witness testimony alone.Achievement of an NVQ unit will unendingly involve observation of the candidate by a qualified assessor taking account of the evidence provided by witness testimony.Simulation This is where the candidate cannot provide evidence to cover PCs and whereasking questions may be insufficient. Examples might be dealing with a health emergency or working with someone who challenges the service.Recognising Prior LearningSTRENGHTS1. If a learner had a previous rpl , it can be used to support their other assessments. Accrediting their prior learning assessment makes a learner feel that any work d one in the yesteryear in this area was not a waste of time 2.qcf is magnanimous learners the opportunity to use rpl more and they define it as a method of assessment that considers whether a learner can demonstrate that they can sustain the requirements of a unit through knowledge, understandingand skills they already possess and do not need to develop through a course of learning. Limitations1.may be time consuming for the assessor as will need to authorise the rpl not all of it may be relevant to the current criteria they are assessing. 2.each assessor needs to check the focus for their relevant qualification, as the guidance varies for different qualifications.Written questioningStrenghts1.Can take the form of essays, short answer questions or fivefold choice questions. Short and multiple choice questioning are examples of accusative testing as there is only one correct answer. This form of assessment is quick and easy to mark wich means feedback can be given promptly to learners.Limitations1.Multiple choice questions can be guessed if the learner is incertain so they might not be the best way to wreak an accurate measure of whether the learner has understood something. If more depth on short answer questions is requied, essays can be used to assess understanding, literacy and spunky level comprehension although they take time for the learners to complete and for the assessor to mark.Oral questioningStrenghts 1.Can form a secondary or backup assessment to check for comprehension. They can be used to support theory while the learner is practising their skills or at work and they can be adapted or changed quickly depending on the situation. 2.open oral questions should be used to draw out the information from the learner. Limitations1.Assessors should be careful not to use closed questions unless testing agreement.