MEDIATION between Saudi Arabia and The U.S Thesis

MEDIATION between Saudi Arabia and The U.S - Thesis ExampleWith a shift in public policies, increasing numbers of corporates and legal firms are using alternative dispute resolution or ADR processes for conflict resolution. This paper explores mediation, which is a type ofalternative dispute resolutionprocess, where a third division or party, known as the mediator, helps the disputing parties to exit a settlement. It will also study the mediation processes followed in the US and Saudi Arabia, while also taking into consideration the mediation methods not adopted by these two countries.Alternative dispute resolution or ADR (also referred to external dispute resolutionin countries, as Australia)1 is a process other than litigation or adjudication in court, in which there is the presence of a neutral third party who helps to resolve conflicts or disputes.2 The process includesconflict resolutionprocedures and mechanisms, which allows the conflicting parties to reach an agreement that w ould not result in litigation. ADR is actually an umbrella term for different ways in which the conflicting parties can work out a resolution, with or even without the presence and assistance of a third party. Despite a general perspective that ADR processes are capable of elevating the outcome quality and the pointedness of justice achieved in a conflict situation, ADR has faced a great deal of resistance in the past. As experts claimed, for decades different forms of dispute resolution (ADR) have been proposed, developed, critiqued, modified, renamed, redefined and slowly brought within the usually suspicious, and sometimes hostile, edifice of state-based normative ordering. Some see this asdemocratic storming of the Kafkaesque citadel of the lawWhile others see it as a dangerous dilution or even undermining of justice.3 Despite the initial resistance, ADR has currently gained global popularity and acceptation amongst the common people and those in thelaw